The MSP’s championing our bats - The Species Champions Initiative 100 day challenge

by Liz Ferrell, BCT's Scottish Officer

I am always a bit apprehensive before bat walks as there is always the weather to contend with in Scotland! But, it has to be said, bats have never disappointed me. They are hardy little mammals and they put on a good display for us as we walked around Holyrood Park in Edinburgh. Perhaps they enjoy the big occasions and Tuesday night was definitely one of those!

Through the Scottish Environment LINK, member organisations (which includes the Bat Conservation Trust (BCT)) were asking over 100 Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSP), who had accepted to become a Species Champion, to participate in a series of actions over a 100 day period (#Species100). We were asking them to help raise awareness about their selected species, the threats to their populations as well as the wider biodiversity concerns in Scotland. 

Taking part in the bat walk as part of this challenge were MSP’s Annie Wells, Finlay Carson and Fulton MacGregor who all attended on what was a wet and windy night at Holyrood. It needed more than rain to dampen their spirits however and it was lovely to chat to them about bats as well as their work as MSP’s. 

All excited to start our bat walk outside the Scottish Parliament 

I am happy to say that their smiles remained there for the remainder of the night! Annie was very pleased to have her species, the common pipistrelle, foraging over her head and we watched as the bat continued to fly back and forth. The poor thing was fighting against the wind and we all agreed that he or she was a determined individual!

Finlay was as keen as ever, even without the opportunity to see or hear his species, the Leisler’s bat. He is very passionate about his chosen species which is found in his constituency of Galloway. He has visited the Wood of Cree where these rare bats are fairly common. Fulton too has still to see his species, the natterer’s bat, and without visiting a roost (which I have promised him) it is a tall order! They are not as easy to find as our pipistrelle species are. But, he knows a lot about his species already and I have run a bat walk for him in his local constituency in August.

Reflecting back on this 100 day challenge, I have to say it has been great. It was such a pleasure to see how genuinely enthusiastic our MSP’s all are about their species and to see that they know so much already about bats! It has certainly kick started my engagement with them and I am really looking forward to working with them all going forward as we organize some more batty evenings. I hope I will have further news to share with you on this initiative soon…

LINK’s award-winning initiative “Species Champions” pairs MSPs with species that are under threat in Scotland. With almost 1 in 10 species in Scotland at risk of extinction, political support for protecting our precious natural environment has never been more critical. To find out more about this initiative check the Scottish Environment LINK’s website here. 

‘Testing Times Ahead – A Cosmic Bat Adventure’

Beverley Clarke, of the Loch Lomond Bat Group (LLBG), explains about a big leap the small group have made this year. 

So, what did you do on the very hot and sunny May Bank Holiday Weekend? (Apologies to those of you in England who were subject to flash flooding). Well, here in Scotland, where summer conditions are a rarity to be savoured, most Scots were making the most of the tropical like conditions - having a barbecue or garden party, going for a picnic, visit to the beach or camping. However, for some Loch

Lomond Bat Group members it was to be a hot and sticky venture into their first BCT/Forest Research ‘Putting UK Woodland Bats on the Map’ survey (PUKWBotM). Loch Lomond Bat Group are a very small hardy bunch of bat enthusiasts.  We have a core membership of just five or six people at any given point, who start each survey season with the hope that they will at least make it through our NBMP surveys and public events programme.  Every year we endeavour to recruit some more hardy souls to join us, but usually by the time we get to Field Survey time, we are back to the Famous Five!

Liz Ferrell helps with set up of SM2

So, it was quite a leap into the unknown for our wee bunch to take something of the magnitude of PUKWBotM.  For context, we have likened it to a classroom full of kids making water bottle rockets in one week and sending one of their pupils to the moon on another week!! Maybe a slight over exaggeration, but when the Scottish Bat Officer Liz Ferrell organised the first training night to help familiarise us with the equipment we would using in the survey, that is what the learning curve felt like.

In brief, for those that may not be aware, the survey involves the of testing three types of bat field monitoring equipment – standard SM2 detectors, low cost acoustic sensors called Audio Moths, and Pettersson Ultrasound Microphones (which connect to tablets).  As well as setting out the static recording points, there is also a walking transect. The final aim is to gather data that can be used to calculate representative detection probabilities for different bat species in woodland, to inform the design of future woodland monitoring schemes.

Adam and Gavin trying to set up an SM2

The two members who gleefully signed us up for the project last year, had to design the transect themselves in two types of woodland; broadleaf and plantation. This they dutifully did last year, and this year were sent through all the gadgets and gizmos, with our key member, Adam, signing his life away to a few thousand pounds worth of BCT equipment.

We now had our ‘rockets’ to play with but had little idea how to launch them despite the extensive manuals and ‘idiot guides’ sent through by the Woodland Officer, Sonia Reveley from London. This is where the amazing Liz Ferrell, the new Scottish Bat Officer stepped in. Through her experience, knowledge, sheer will, enthusiasm, Doodle Polls and some backside kicking, she helped those that signed up to get trained, set up the first dates for the surveys and helped us set up the equipment for the first survey on a sticky midge filled Saturday night in a broadleaf woodland in the Trossachs, after having driven directly from Wick from her holiday! By the Monday night for the plantation survey, we were on our own!  The mission to the moon had begun!

With the first month’s surveys done, we have another four to go. We have already hit a couple of meteorite-like snags on our mission, but we are still learning.  Maybe by the 3rd or 4th survey, we might make it all the way there!

We are very proud, if a little foolish, to be the only bat group in Scotland attempting this survey, but if we can pull it off, it may seem like a small step for those bat conservationists out there, who do this on a regular basis, but for us it will be a great leap for little group of enthusiasts.
Finally, a huge thank you to Liz for her help, support and dedication to our group and for getting us to the launch pad in time….to infinity and…. right enough of that!!

Liz Ferrel and Suzie the guinea pig with trainees

An interview with a Helpline Out of Hours Volunteer

Rachael Varney is a Bat Helpline Out of Hours (OOH) volunteer, a service where volunteers answer emergency calls from the public who have found a bat in need of help. The OOH Bat Helpline is active in the evenings (5:30PM - 10:30PM) and on weekends and bank holidays (9AM - 10:30PM). 

What inspired you to volunteer on the national bat helpline out of hours service (OOH)?

I used to work as a veterinary receptionist and when injured or grounded bats were brought in to the surgery I would always have a quick peek at them in the box! Nobody seemed to know much about how to care for them, but luckily, we had a very knowledgeable bat carer who we would call upon to take them off our hands. When I saw the volunteer opportunity for OOH, I thought it would be great to learn more about bats, and hopefully do a little to help them too.

There are lots of wildlife you could have given your time to, why bats?

I think bats are misunderstood and somewhat shrouded in mystery, and many people dislike or even fear them. As well as wanting to learn more about bats myself, I hope I can educate people whilst doing the OOH call taking to realise what interesting creatures they really are.

What do you enjoy about volunteering on OOH?

I enjoy talking to different people from all over the UK – you never know who will be on the other end of the phone, or what situation the bat is in. Most people who have taken the time to call OOH, have a genuine desire to help the bat, even if they have a fear or are unsure of what to do. It’s great to be able to give people advice and the confidence to be able to help the bat – there’s a real feel-good factor involved. I enjoy learning about ways we can lessen our impact on the natural world and regularly get involved with online petitions on social media, but I sometimes feel overwhelmed by all the negativity. OOH has shown me that there are some really kind people who are willing to go out of their way to help, and that’s quite uplifting.

What’s your at-home set up like for OOH?

I make sure I have everything to hand -  some snacks, a couple of cold drinks, a notepad and pen, and my OOH folder given to me during training. I’m quite lucky to have a spare bedroom that acts as a little office, so I can concentrate on OOH without too many distractions, although I do sometimes end up with the cat sat on my knee!

Do you have a favourite or most satisfying call that you can share with us?

I think my favourite call so far was from a gentleman who had been out walking his dog on a park and had seen a bat trapped behind the mesh of a large disused speaker. Before calling OOH he had already contacted the places I was going to recommend – the RSPCA, the local council to see who the speakers belonged to, a security firm connected to the park. I was at a loss as to what to suggest, but put him in touch with a bat carer local to him, in the hope they might have come across a similar situation before and had some more ideas. I was hopeful, but really worried it would not be a happy ending for the bat.

After my Bat Watch, I spoke to my allocated Back up Staff (during Bat Watches,  volunteers always have a phone number available for a member of staff from the Bat Conservation Trust to provide advice or assistance, which is really reassuring). I decided to call the gentleman back just to double check we had discussed every possible avenue of people or places to call upon for help in trying to rescue the bat. I’m so glad I made that call as what he told me made my weekend! The RSPCA had managed to send out an inspector, and the bat carer who I put him in touch with had attended to help, along with the local fire brigade! They managed to saw through the speaker so that the bat carer was able to get close enough to get hold of the bat and safely contain him. It was a fantastic team effort from everyone involved to rescue this little pipistrelle bat, fondly named Boris by the man who spotted him. I have since heard that Boris had a little rest and recuperation that evening with the bat carer and was fit enough to be released the following evening.

How about your most challenging call so far?

So far, I’ve been quite lucky, and I’d say my most challenging call was from a lady who was struggling to hear me over the excited chattering of her young children who had just found a bat! I think it’s important that children take an interest in nature and advised the caller that the Bat Conservation Trust would happily send out some children’s activity packs, so they could learn more about bats.

What advice would you offer to anyone else considering taking up OOH volunteering next year?

Go for it! Although I come from an ‘animal background’ having worked in a veterinary practice, I knew hardly anything about bats.  The Bat Conservation Trust provide a day’s training which covers everything you need to know to get started on OOH call taking and offer great support for volunteers along the way. OOH volunteers are usually the first port of call for members of the public who have found a bat and are usually the ones who ‘get the ball rolling’ for a rescue / rehabilitation attempt. It feels great to be part of something so beneficial for British wildlife.   

We have to ask… favourite bat and why?

I’ve not seen one in real life (yet!), but it has to be the long-eared bat. Those ears are just too cute!

Twilight Bat Walks

by David Jackson from Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust

In the United Kingdom we have 18 species of bat, all are insectivorous and a great environmental indicator. A single bat can eat up to 3000 midges in one night making them an excellent natural insect controller, but unfortunately over the last century their populations have declined, making each roost important for future survival. Due to their decline, bats and their roosts are protected under UK and European law with a roost defined as any place that a wild bat uses and is protected whether bats are present or not.

At Mid-Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, we are proud to have high bat activity around our Broomfield Hospital site, with a bat roost of Soprano Pipistrelles known and monitored for several years.  Both Soprano & Common Pipistrelles have been found foraging within our natural areas, feeding on insects during their summer months and highlighting our effective natural management on site. 

Bat walks offer a unique educational opportunity to experience these intriguing creatures, and in 2016 we launched an inaugural Twilight Bat Walk Programme, led by a local bat enthusiast.  The walks proved to be a huge success, providing education in an endangered species whilst promoting healthy walking alternatives within Broomfield Hospital and community.  Following on from these walks, a larger Twilight Programme was produced for the summer of 2017.  

A stunning 400% increase in participation occurred, with over 100 individuals expressing interest, comprising of staff, patients and members of our local community.  David Jackson, the bat enthusiast, and now the Trust’s Sustainability Project Coordinator said ‘It’s been great to see the walk participation increase so quickly…educating those in our community about endangered species is hugely valuable to their future conservation, whilst achieving it through the promotions of an active lifestyle.’ 

Supported by the Essex Bat Group and Heart & Sole Walking Scheme the 2018 Twilight Programme is now available.  Join us with friends and family to experience the hospital site bat activity and roost.  What will you find? 

The Bat Walk Dates 

25th May, starts 8:30pm 

13th July, starts 8:45pm 

27th July, starts 8:25pm 

17th August, starts 7:45pm 

7th September, starts 7:00pm

Spaces are limited, on a first come first serve basis.  If you’d like to express an interest please contact David Jackson on sustainable.development@meht.nhs.uk or 01245 514558.  

Bats in Greywell tunnel, Hampshire

by Paul Hope

Greywell tunnel is a disused canal tunnel on the Basingstoke Canal in north Hampshire. The 1,124m long brick lined tunnel was constructed in tandem with the canal between 1788 and 1794. The tunnel is approximately 5m high and has a maximum width of 4.5m. It was excavated through an area of changing geology from Hampshire chalk through Reading beds into London clay. There was a partial collapse in the tunnel during the 1930s and a further fall during the 1950s that left the bore of the tunnel blocked about 800m from its eastern entrance and at 130 m from its western entrance. Bat friendly grilles prevent public access to the site.

Greywell tunnel has long been known as an important site for hibernating and swarming bats. It was designated a SSSI for bats in 1985. Hibernation surveys are conducted from a boat by a team of up to five surveyors. As you work your way into the tunnel light from the portal becomes a distant dot. During hibernation counts many of the bats encountered are hanging against the brick lining, however a high proportion are often packed into crevices and openings in the brickwork left during the tunnels construction. Within crevices it’s sometimes a matter of counting ears and feet to get as accurate a count as possible and on occasion it’s not possible to record bats to species.

Natterer's bats at Greywell. (c) Roy Champion

Natterer’s bat is the most commonly encountered species (highest count of 569 in 2013), Daubenton’s bat is also regularly recorded (highest count of 69 in 1986). We also often record whiskered, Brandt’s and brown long-eared bats. The count this January gave some very exciting results. We had our second highest count for Natterer’s bat in the eastern end (564) and our first ever record of a greater horseshoe bat. The horseshoe bat is an excellent record for North Hampshire. Bat Group records show it is the seventh on record; this includes two records for Winchester from the 1940s.

Greater horseshoe bat at Greywell. (c) Roy Champion

Sadly after over 30 years of monitoring at the site, future regular monitoring is threatened by a recent move by the owners Hampshire County Council to declare it a Confined Space. Now surveys can only be conducted once every two years due to the excessive costs of gas monitoring equipment and a rescue team stationed outside the tunnel. We do not feel that this is often enough to provide adequate data resolution for the SSSI condition assessment, but Natural England have said that it will be sufficient.

Using acoustics to assess biodiversity in cities

by Alison Fairbrass

Cities now support over half of the world’s human population. They also support endemic and threatened wildlife. This wildlife provides multiple ecological services to human urban populations, and also provides the daily contact with nature that most of us now experience. However, our understanding of how wildlife persists in urban environments, and how we can design and manage cities to provide the best possible habitat for wildlife is still not very well understood. One reason for this is due to the difficulties of assessing biodiversity, especially in cities. Human surveyors have to consider safety issues, survey equipment is vulnerable to vandalism, theft and destruction, and getting access to private land to conduct surveys can be very bureaucratic. Through my Engineering Doctoral research (EngD) I developed new acoustic tools that can be used to make it easier to assess biodiversity in urban environments. These tools should hopefully be used in the future to better understand the biodiversity supported by cities and to inform the design and management of cities for biodiversity.

Acoustics and biodiversity assessment

Lots of wildlife produce sounds, either by vocalising – think a singing songbird - or through movements of their bodies – think the hum from the rapid wingbeats of a bumblebee. Some species also make sounds that cannot be heard by humans, such as the ultrasonic echolocations of bats.

Ornithologists have used the species-specific calls emitted by birds to identify calling species for centuries. More recently, ultrasonic recorders have been used to record the species-specific echolocation calls of bats which can be used to identify species.

But these examples are very species-specific. There are other species that live in cities such as insects and non-flying land animals like foxes and squirrels that also make sound.

The field of ecoacoustics uses the sounds emitted by all species to get a measure of whole ecological communities, rather than focussing on specific species and species groups. Ecoacoustic theory posits that the soundscape (sounds at a landscape scale) of an environment is composed of biophony (sounds emitted by non-human organisms), anthrophony (sounds associated with human activities) and geophony (abiotic sounds such as wind and rain).

The three elements that compose a soundscape: biophony, anthrophony and geophony. Image credit: Pijanowski et al. (2011) BioScience.

New technology for ecoacoustics

The use of ecoacoustics to monitor biodiversity has really been made possible by the development of passive acoustic recording technology, such as the very popular products from Wildlife Acoustics. These are weather-proof acoustic recorders that can be left outside for long periods of time, recording sound on a user-defined schedule. This technology is making it possible for biodiversity scientists and conservationists to collect vast amounts of acoustic recordings.

An SM2+ SongMeter is an example of a passive acoustic recorder that is commonly used in ecoacoustic research. These devices can be deployed in the environment recording at a pre-defined schedule for days/weeks/months at a time. Image credit: www.wildlifeacoustics.com.

But what to do with all this acoustic data? It is not practical or efficient to spend days/weeks/years listening to the recordings that have been made.

To overcome this Big Data problem, ecoacousticians have developed algorithms that can measure the biotic sound in acoustic recordings producing a proxy measure of biodiversity. These algorithms are called acoustic indices and can be used to quickly produce measures of the biotic sound in large volumes of acoustic data. They measure a few characteristics of the acoustic data, such as the amount of sound at particular frequencies, to produce a summary measure of biotic sound within an entire sound recording.

Acoustic indices produce measures of the biotic sound in audio recordings. Four commonly used acoustic indices include: A) Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI, Pieretti et al. 2011 Ecol. Indic.), B) Acoustic Diversity Index (ADI, Villanueva-Rivera et al. 2011 Landscape Ecol.), C) Bioacoustic Index (BI, Boelman et al. 2007 Ecol. Appl.) and D) Normalised Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI, Kasten et al. 2012 Ecol. Inform.). The ACI sums the absolute difference in signal power within frequency bins over time using a sliding window and defined temporal steps (indicated by arrow). The ADI is calculated as the Shannon’s diversity index for each recording based on the signal power occupancy of each 1 kHz frequency band. The BI calculates the signal power within 2-8 kHz frequency band of recordings. The NDSI calculates the ratio of signal power in the frequency bands between 1-2 kHz and 2-8 kHz to measure the level of anthropogenic disturbance on the landscape.

Ecoacoustics in the city

However, ecoacoustic research and the development of acoustic indices has tended to focus on less disturbed environments than cities, such as temperate woodlands, coastal forests and Mediterranean scrub. The challenge of my EngD research was to see if ecoacoustic could be applied in this new, highly anthropogenically disturbed environment.

I started off by assessing the suitability of a suite of commonly used acoustic indices for use in the urban environment. I collected low (0-12kHz) and high (12-96kHz) frequency audio recordings from 15 churchyard sites across the Greater London area. I was lucky to collaborate with the Diocese of London on this data collection while they conducted a London-wide ecological survey of their churchyards.

Setting up my acoustic sensors

To test exactly what sounds the acoustic indices measured in the acoustic data, I listened to and manually labelled the sounds in a random selection of my recordings. To do this, I co-developed AudioTagger, a bespoke audio analysis software that allows you to quickly listen to and view audio recordings, and draw labelled bounding boxes around sounds on spectrograms (a visual representation of an audio recording).

AudioTagger in action. Sound recordings can be quickly listened to, viewed as spectrograms and annotated by drawing labelled bounding boxes around sounds of interest. Sounds labelled here include birds (blue boxes), electrical buzzes (pink) and road traffic (red).

I identified a very wide range of sounds in my recordings. Anthropogenic sounds dominated the dataset and the variety was much greater than in previous ecoacoustic studies, including sounds such as road traffic, sirens, church bells, footsteps, and applause. Biotic sounds were mainly made by birds and bats, and geophonic sounds were either wind or rain.

Of the four acoustic indices I tested, either the measures of the acoustic indices did not correlate with the amount of biotic sound in recordings, or were biased by non-biotic sounds in recordings (Fairbrass et al.2017).
 
Therefore, I would not recommend that any of the acoustic indices I tested are used to assess biodiversity in urban environments.

Machine learning as an alternative to acoustic indices

Machine learning algorithms learn to recognise patterns in data based on examples that they’ve seen previously, for example how a spam email application learns to filter emails based on what a user has previously marked as spam (skip to 32:38 for a great introduction to machine learning).

Deep learning algorithms (a type of machine learning) choose by themselves what characteristics define different groups of data, rather than relying on humans to choose. Therefore they can use many more parameters within data to characterise groups than a human ever could, making them extremely powerful.

Machine learning algorithms are potentially much more powerful than acoustic indices, as they do not rely on human defined characteristics of data. What they do rely on is having a large dataset of labelled data with which to learn the characteristics of different groups.

To train a deep learning algorithm that could measure biotic sound in audio recordings from the urban environment without being biased by the non-biotic sounds in the city, I collected audio recordings from 63 sites across the Greater London area.

I used AudioTagger to label all the biotic, anthropogenic and geophonic sounds in a random selection of 45 minutes of recordings from each of the 63 sites. This labelled data was used to train and test a pair of Convolutional Neural Network algorithms, CityNet (Fairbrass Firman et al. in review), which produce a measure of biotic and anthropogenic acoustic activity in noisy acoustic recordings from the urban environment.

Audio data recorded at 63 green infrastructure sites in and around Greater London (A) was used to train (black dots) and test (red dots) the CityNet system. CityNet can be used to summarise the biotic and anthropogenic sounds in large volumes of audio data from noisy urban environments. A week of audio recordings are summarised here to produce daily average patterns of biotic and anthropogenic sound (B and C), which can be interesting to compare between different types of environments, such as sites in the centre (B) and on the outskirts (C) of the city. Image Credit: M. Firman

The algorithms can be used to produce summaries of the biotic and anthropogenic sound in large volumes of audio data from cities – at http://londonsounds.org/ you can explore the patterns of biotic and anthropogenic sound at my 63 study sites.

Biotic sound as a proxy measure for biodiversity

An open question that remains in ecoacoustics is whether biotic sound is a good proxy measure for biodiversity? And does more biotic sound mean more or better biodiversity? Some have argued that due to the way species avoid calling at the same time and frequency, more sound does correlate with more diversity, but that this relationship only holds in the tropics (Krause & Farina 2016).

To investigate whether biotic sound can be used as a proxy measure of habitats in cities, I conducted habitat surveys at all my study sites and compared local and landscape habitat measures with the biotic and anthropogenic acoustic activity and diversity.

Initial results suggest that there is a relationship between the biotic sound recorded at a site, and the characteristics of the local and landscape habitat. However, this research needs a bit more work before I’m confident in the results, and I will continue to work on this to try and answer the question of whether biotic sound can be used as a proxy measure of habitats in cities.

Next steps

In this research I have found that existing ecoacoustic tools in the form of acoustic indices are not suitable for use in cities as they either do not measure biotic sound or are biased by non-biotic sounds in recordings (Fairbrasset al. 2017). To overcome the shortcomings of acoustic indices, I have developed deep learning tools, CityNet (Fairbrass Firman et al. in review), which measure the biotic and anthropogenic sound in acoustic recordings made in noisy urban environments. Finally, I have found that biotic sound may be a good proxy for the characteristics of habitats in cities.

Cities are exciting places in which to develop new technologies for assessing biodiversity because the availability of power and Wifi connectivity makes it possible to develop autonomous systems for monitoring wildlife. For example, smart sensors and machine learning algorithms have been used to develop the world’s first end-to-end system for monitoring bat populations in the urban environment (www.naturesmartcities.com ). I think it is important that machine learning and sensing technologies continue to be used to improve our understanding of wildlife in cities, enabling us to design and manage better cities for the future.

Daubenton's on ice!

From BCT's Scottish Officer, Liz Ferrell, comes a fascinating story of winter bat behaviour:

Graham White, a nature enthusiast, had never seen a Daubenton’s bat before and certainly not during daylight hours! He therefore felt very lucky to see one (on two separate occasions) over the festive period where he lives in Coldstream, the Scottish Borders. Graham told us he had been walking along a section of the River Tweed on the 4^th December. It was south facing and the bank was getting a lot of warmth - even on a very cold day. The old mill weir also meant the river was slow flowing and about a metre deep. The result was like a mirror with not even a ripple on the water. The only movement came from insects which dotted the surface. And then there it was, a Daubenton’s bat flying over the water at one o’clock in the afternoon!
 
By pure chance, on the 7^th January, Graham saw another Daubenton’s. This time 1.5 miles from the River Tweed flying over Hirsel Lake along with the geese, swans and goldeneye he had been watching. The bat flew right next to Graham and for a further two minutes he watched and photographed the bat before it disappeared into the waterside trees. Graham mentions that the most astonishing thing this time around was that the lake was 95% covered in thin ice! The bat of course had found the other 5% unfrozen water (all thanks to some very clumsy geese after they had landed on the lake).
 
It led Graham to ask what exactly the bats were doing – were they drinking, actively foraging, both, or neither! In truth, it is hard to say. It was certainly a very surprising encounter with this little hunter. I think this story just goes to show that we have so much to learn about bats' activities through the winter and perhaps climate change is also going to have its effects. We all hope that these two bats were able to survive the winter.
 
Thank you Graham White for sharing your story and photos!

Have any readers seen anything similar? I'd love to hear about it!